sloth: be at forest canopy

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest canopy 1.00
be at tree in rainforest 0.85
be at forest 0.85
be at in forest 0.84
be at tropical forest 0.83
be at rain forest 0.82
be at tropical rain forest 0.82
be at jungle tree 0.82
be at tree in jungle 0.82
be find in forest 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)