soccer player: is is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.71
, soccer
Weight: 0.66
, student
Weight: 0.62
, celebrity
Weight: 0.57
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.77
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, hockey player
Weight: 0.41
, tennis player
Weight: 0.41
, lacrosse player
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is paid 1.00
get paid 0.95
is paid weekly 0.81
get paid more than professional women 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, is is paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, is is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(athlete, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(soccer player, is is paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(soccer player, is is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(football player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hockey player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey player, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(soccer player, is is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, get paid)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(soccer player, get paid)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(soccer player, get paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(soccer player, get paid more than professional women)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(soccer player, get paid more than professional women)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(soccer player, get paid more than professional women)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, get paid more than professional women)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, is is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(soccer player, is is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)