steak: be more expensive than chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than chicken 1.00
be more expensive than beef 0.90
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.86
get more expensive 0.85
be much more costly today 0.80
is expensive 0.80
is expensive now 0.80
be cheaper online than than store 0.80
be less rare than ones 0.79
get expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(item, be cheaper online than than store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(steak, be more expensive than chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(steak, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(steak, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(steak, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)