tablet: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
become expensive 0.91
get more expensive 0.90
is cheaper 0.85
be more expensive than than tv 0.80
be more expensive than laptops 0.80
is cheap 0.79
get exorbitantly expensive 0.79
is less popular 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tablet, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nokia, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(nokia, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tablet, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nokia, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nokia, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(nokia, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(nokia, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tablet, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tablet, is less popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tablet, is less popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, is less popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tablet, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nokia, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nokia, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tablet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)