tablet: is less popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less popular 1.00
is popular 0.86
get more expensive 0.83
be more expensive than than tv 0.81
is most popular computer 0.81
become expensive 0.80
be less expensive than smartphones 0.79
is expensive 0.78
be more expensive than laptops 0.77
is cheaper 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(personal computer, is most popular computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tablet, is less popular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electronic device, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tablet, is less popular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tablet, is less popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is most popular computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is popular)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is most popular computer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tablet computer, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nokia, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electronic device, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, is less popular)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(personal computer, is most popular computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, is less popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tablet, is less popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(smartphone, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is popular)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tablet computer, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tablet computer, is popular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nokia, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nokia, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tablet, is less popular)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tablet, is popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tablet, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tablet, is popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tablet, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tablet, is popular)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is popular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tablet, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tablet, is less popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(electronic device, is popular)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(personal computer, is most popular computer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smartphone, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tablet computer, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nokia, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(electronic device, is popular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(personal computer, is most popular computer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tablet, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)