target: is good company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good company 1.00
be good company work 0.96
be good company work for 0.95
has state company 0.88
is cost strategy company 0.81
is low cost strategy company 0.81
be important in business 0.78
be important to business 0.78
has quality good 0.77
has physical part corporation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is good company)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is good company)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(goal, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is good company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(goal, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(goal, be important in business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(target, is good company)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(target, is good company)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(goal, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(target, is good company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(target, is good company)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(target, be good company work for)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(target, be important to business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(target, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(target, has physical part corporation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, has physical part corporation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(target, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(target, has physical part corporation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(target, has physical part corporation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(target, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is good company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(goal, be important in business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(goal, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(target, is good company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)