timber: be important as resource

Related concepts

Parents	crop Weight: 0.66 , commodity Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.64 , raw material Weight: 0.61 , material Weight: 0.58
Siblings	balsa Weight: 0.39 , lumber Weight: 0.37 , wood pulp Weight: 0.37 , wood Weight: 0.36 , steel wool Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important as resource	1.00
is important resource	0.98
is important natural resource	0.93
has quality resource	0.91
is natural resource	0.91
was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century	0.89
was such important resource in century	0.89
is sustainable resource	0.86
is renewable resource	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(timber, be important as resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(timber, be important as resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(timber, be important as resource)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important resource)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(timber, is important resource)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(timber, is important natural resource)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(timber, has quality resource)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(timber, is important resource)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(timber, is renewable resource)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(timber, has quality resource)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(timber, is important natural resource)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(timber, is important resource)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, has quality resource)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(timber, is important natural resource)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(timber, be important as resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(wood, is renewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(timber, be important as resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)