timber: is important natural resource

Related concepts

Parents	crop Weight: 0.66 , commodity Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.64 , raw material Weight: 0.61 , material Weight: 0.58
Siblings	balsa Weight: 0.39 , lumber Weight: 0.37 , wood pulp Weight: 0.37 , wood Weight: 0.36 , steel wool Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is important natural resource	1.00
is natural resource	0.98
is important resource	0.95
be important as resource	0.93
has quality resource	0.89
is sustainable resource	0.86
was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century	0.86
was such important resource in century	0.86
is renewable resource	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(timber, is important natural resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(timber, is important natural resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(timber, is important natural resource)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important resource)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(timber, is important resource)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(timber, be important as resource)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(timber, has quality resource)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(timber, is renewable resource)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(timber, be important as resource)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(timber, is important resource)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(timber, be important as resource)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(timber, has quality resource)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(timber, is important resource)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, has quality resource)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(timber, is important natural resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(wood, is renewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(timber, is important natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)