timber: has quality resource

Related concepts

Parents	crop Weight: 0.66 , commodity Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.64 , raw material Weight: 0.61 , material Weight: 0.58
Siblings	balsa Weight: 0.39 , lumber Weight: 0.37 , wood pulp Weight: 0.37 , wood Weight: 0.36 , steel wool Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality resource	1.00
is important resource	0.92
be important as resource	0.91
is natural resource	0.90
is important natural resource	0.89
is sustainable resource	0.86
was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century	0.83
was such important resource in century	0.83
is renewable resource	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(timber, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(timber, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important resource)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(timber, is important resource)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(timber, be important as resource)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(timber, is important natural resource)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(timber, is renewable resource)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(timber, be important as resource)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(timber, is important resource)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(timber, be important as resource)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(timber, is important natural resource)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(timber, is important resource)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable resource)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(timber, is important natural resource)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(timber, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(wood, is renewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(timber, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)