tuition: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.62
, college student
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, need
Weight: 0.58
Siblings graduate student
Weight: 0.36
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, undergraduate
Weight: 0.34
, high school
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
improve quality 0.81
improve quality of education 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tuition, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tuition, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(tuition, improve quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)