tuition: improve quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.62
, college student
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, need
Weight: 0.58
Siblings graduate student
Weight: 0.36
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, undergraduate
Weight: 0.34
, high school
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve quality 1.00
improve quality of education 0.93
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(high school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(tuition, improve quality)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tuition, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tuition, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)