unemployment: lead to recession

Related concepts

Parents	income Weight: 0.66 , indicator Weight: 0.66 , spending Weight: 0.64 , benefit Weight: 0.63 , situation Weight: 0.63
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.34 , economy Weight: 0.34 , unearned income Weight: 0.33 , crisis Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
lead to recession	1.00
is recession	0.94
go into recession	0.93
be for economy	0.78
is economy	0.78
help economy	0.78
be bad for economy	0.77
be good for economy	0.77
lead to inflation	0.77
exist in market economy	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(unemployment, lead to recession)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(unemployment, lead to recession)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(unemployment, lead to recession)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(spending, be for economy)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(spending, help economy)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(economy, is recession)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(economy, go into recession)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(economy, is recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(economy, is recession)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(economy, go into recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(economy, go into recession)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in market economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(unemployment, lead to recession)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(unemployment, lead to inflation)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to inflation)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(unemployment, lead to inflation)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(unemployment, lead to inflation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(unemployment, lead to recession)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(poverty, exist in market economy)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(economy, is recession)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(economy, go into recession)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(unemployment, lead to recession) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)