unemployment: be good for economy

Related concepts

Parents	income Weight: 0.66 , indicator Weight: 0.66 , spending Weight: 0.64 , benefit Weight: 0.63 , situation Weight: 0.63
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.34 , economy Weight: 0.34 , unearned income Weight: 0.33 , crisis Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for economy	1.00
be bad for economy	0.98
be for economy	0.96
is economy	0.94
help economy	0.92
affect economy	0.90
be known as economy	0.88
exist in market economy	0.87
exist in free market economy	0.86
have effect on overall growth of economy	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(spending, be for economy)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(spending, help economy)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(poverty, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(poverty, affect economy)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in market economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(unemployment, be good for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(unemployment, affect economy)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(unemployment, affect economy)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(unemployment, affect economy)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, affect economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(poverty, affect economy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(poverty, exist in market economy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(poverty, exist in free market economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(unemployment, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)