virginia: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north america
Weight: 0.65
, santa claus
Weight: 0.63
, colony
Weight: 0.59
, tobacco
Weight: 0.59
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.77
, george washington
Weight: 0.76
, kentucky
Weight: 0.61
, yorktown
Weight: 0.40
, latin america
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
is most miserable state 0.80
has state state 0.79
was important state 0.77
is worst state 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tobacco, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tobacco, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is worst state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tobacco, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(west virginia, is most miserable state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kentucky, is poor state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(kentucky, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(kentucky, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(west virginia, is worst state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is worst state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(virginia, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(virginia, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is worst state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(virginia, is worst state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(virginia, is worst state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(virginia, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(virginia, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(virginia, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(virginia, is worst state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(virginia, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(virginia, was important state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(virginia, was important state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(virginia, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(virginia, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(virginia, was important state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(virginia, was important state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(virginia, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tobacco, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(kentucky, is poor state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(kentucky, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(west virginia, is worst state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tobacco, has quality bad)