west virginia: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south carolina
Weight: 0.79
, north carolina
Weight: 0.78
, virginia
Weight: 0.77
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.76
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.38
, florida
Weight: 0.38
, charleston
Weight: 0.37
, norfolk
Weight: 0.36
, charlotte
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
is miserable state 0.81
is most miserable state 0.80
be in state 0.80
has state state 0.79
is worst state 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(south carolina, is poor)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(virginia, is most miserable state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(virginia, has state state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is worst state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(virginia, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(virginia, is worst state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(south carolina, is poor)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(south carolina, is poor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(virginia, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is worst state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(virginia, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(south carolina, is poor)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(virginia, is most miserable state)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(virginia, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is worst state)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(west virginia, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(west virginia, be in state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is worst state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is worst state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(west virginia, is worst state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(west virginia, be in state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(west virginia, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(west virginia, be in state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(west virginia, is worst state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(west virginia, is poor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, be in state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south carolina, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(virginia, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(virginia, is worst state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(virginia, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(virginia, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(virginia, is worst state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south carolina, is poor)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(virginia, has quality bad)