whippet: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, breed
Weight: 0.48
, pet
Weight: 0.41
, anything
Weight: 0.30
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.37
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.36
, small dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
is good pets 0.93
be called dogs 0.82
is puppies 0.79
puppies 0.78
is puppy 0.78
puppy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(whippet, has state pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(whippet, has state pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(beagle, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(whippet, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(whippet, is good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(whippet, be called dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(whippet, puppies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(whippet, is puppies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(whippet, is good pets)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(whippet, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(dachshund, be called dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(whippet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)