whiskey: have aged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.68
, liquor
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, drink
Weight: 0.59
, commodity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings scotch
Weight: 0.68
, bourbon
Weight: 0.66
, brandy
Weight: 0.64
, rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have aged 1.00
be aged 0.99
is aged 0.99
be aged 12 years 0.96
taste aged 0.92
taste better aged 0.90
be aged in oak 0.83
be aged in barrel 0.82
age 0.82
is aged longer than bourbon 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(whiskey, have aged)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be aged in oak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rum, is aged)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(whiskey, have aged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is aged)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rum, is aged)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rum, is aged)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(whiskey, have aged)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(whiskey, be aged)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(whiskey, is aged)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(whiskey, be aged in oak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(whiskey, be aged in barrel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be aged in barrel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be aged)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in barrel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is aged)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged in barrel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(whiskey, age)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(whiskey, age)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(whiskey, age)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(whiskey, have aged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(liquor, be aged in oak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bourbon, is aged)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rum, is aged)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(whiskey, have aged)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(liquor, be aged in oak)