york: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.40
, washington
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, london
Weight: 0.34
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was built 0.83
was created 0.83
was established 0.81
was formed 0.79
was called in 1601 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(york, was developed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(york, was developed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(york, was developed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(york, was developed)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(york, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(new york, was developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york, was built)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was built)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(london, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(york, was developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(york, was developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(york, was developed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(york, was developed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(york, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(london, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(london, was created)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(york, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(york, was built)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(york, was created)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(york, was established)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(york, was created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(york, was built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(york, was formed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(york, was built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(york, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(york, was formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(york, was established)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(york, was established)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(york, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(york, was built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(york, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(york, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(york, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(york, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, was developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(london, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, was developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)