actress: get in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get in movies 1.00
get in good movies 0.97
make movies 0.96
make bad movies 0.94
look better in movies 0.91
get paid less than actors 0.75
make less than actors 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, look better in movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(actor, get in movies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(actor, look better in movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(actress, get in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(actress, make movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(actress, make movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(actress, make movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(actress, make bad movies)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(actress, make bad movies)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(actress, make bad movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actress, get in good movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(actress, get in good movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(actress, look better in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(actress, make bad movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, make movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(actress, look better in movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(actress, get in good movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(actress, make less than actors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(actress, make less than actors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actress, make less than actors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actress, make less than actors)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, get in movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actor, look better in movies)