actress: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
get paid less 0.90
get paid less than actors 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(actress, is paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(actress, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(celebrity, is paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, is paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(singer, get paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(movie star, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(actress, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(actress, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(movie star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(movie star, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(singer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(singer, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(actor, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(actress, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(actress, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(actress, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(actress, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(singer, get paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(movie star, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(actress, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)