architecture: be related to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, computer architecture
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, sculpture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings castle
Weight: 0.61
, pyramid
Weight: 0.60
, topology
Weight: 0.54
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.49
, steeple
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to science 1.00
be related science 1.00
be related physical science 0.95
be science 0.93
is science 0.92
be related to environmental science 0.91
be considered science 0.90
be physical science 0.89
be afraid of science 0.84
be used in math 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(architecture, be related to science)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(architecture, be physical science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architecture, be physical science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related physical science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architecture, be related physical science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be physical science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architecture, is science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(architecture, is science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related physical science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(architecture, be physical science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(architecture, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architecture, be related physical science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architecture, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(architecture, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(architecture, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(architecture, be used in math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architecture, be used in math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be considered science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(architecture, be related science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(architecture, be related science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(architecture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)