astronomy: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
is science 0.93
be considered young science 0.93
be considered true science 0.91
be considered original science 0.89
be part of earth science 0.86
is old science 0.86
is earth science 0.86
is true science 0.85
relate to science 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(astronomy, is science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(astronomy, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(astronomy, is earth science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(astronomy, is earth science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is earth science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(astronomy, relate to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(astronomy, is old science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(astronomy, is true science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is old science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is true science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is true science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is old science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is earth science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(astronomy, is true science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(astronomy, is old science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)