astronomy: be considered young science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered young science 1.00
be considered science 0.93
be considered true science 0.88
is science 0.87
is old science 0.87
be considered original science 0.83
be identified as science 0.83
be part of earth science 0.83
is true science 0.83
relate to science 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered young science)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(astronomy, is science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(astronomy, is old science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(astronomy, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(astronomy, is old science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(astronomy, is true science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(astronomy, be identified as science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is old science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(astronomy, relate to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(astronomy, be identified as science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(astronomy, is true science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is true science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be identified as science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is old science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be identified as science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is true science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered young science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)