astronomy: be considered true science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered true science 1.00
is true science 0.97
be considered science 0.91
be considered young science 0.88
be considered original science 0.87
is true 0.87
is science 0.85
relate to science 0.82
be part of earth science 0.82
is earth science 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered true science)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(astronomy, is true science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(astronomy, is true science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is true science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(astronomy, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(astronomy, is true)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(astronomy, is science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(astronomy, is true)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(astronomy, is earth science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(astronomy, relate to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(astronomy, is earth science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is true)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is earth science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is true science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered young science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered original science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is true)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is earth science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered true science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered true science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)