camel: be best mode in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best mode in desert 1.00
be better in desert 0.87
be good in desert 0.87
be in desert 0.85
be important in desert 0.85
be important to desert 0.85
be useful in desert 0.83
live in desert 0.83
be important in sahara desert 0.83
survive in desert 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camel, be best mode in desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(donkey, survive in desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(donkey, survive in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(donkey, survive in desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(camel, be best mode in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, survive in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(camel, survive in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(camel, survive in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(camel, survive in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, survive in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, survive in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(camel, be useful in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(camel, be useful in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(camel, be useful in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(camel, be useful in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(camel, survive in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(camel, survive in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camel, be best mode in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mammal, survive in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(donkey, survive in desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(camel, be best mode in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mammal, survive in desert)