casserole: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.58
, recipe
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, sauce
Weight: 0.55
, meal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings macaroni
Weight: 0.65
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, ravioli
Weight: 0.36
, petri dish
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
is good for 0.82
be bad company work for 0.79
be bad for game 0.78
be bad company work 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sauce, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dish, be bad company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sauce, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sauce, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(macaroni, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sauce, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dish, be bad company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lasagna, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(macaroni, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(macaroni, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(casserole, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(casserole, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(casserole, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(casserole, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lasagna, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(macaroni, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(casserole, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)