catcher: be in rye bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rye bad 1.00
be in rye good 0.99
be in rye 0.98
be in rye called 0.97
was in rye 0.97
be in rye popular 0.96
be in rye matter 0.96
be in rye famous 0.96
be in rye significant 0.94
be in rye classic 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye bad)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(catcher, was in rye)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catcher, was in rye)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(catcher, was in rye)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad)