catcher: be in rye matter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rye matter 1.00
be in rye 0.97
be in rye good 0.96
was in rye 0.96
be in rye called 0.96
be in rye bad 0.96
be in rye famous 0.94
be in rye popular 0.94
be in rye significant 0.93
be in rye classic 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(catcher, was in rye)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catcher, was in rye)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(catcher, was in rye)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye significant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye classic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)