cgi: be in movie cost money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in movie cost money 1.00
be in movies cost 0.92
cost money 0.91
be in movies expensive 0.83
be expensive on movies 0.82
shows much cost 0.81
means more money 0.80
have impact on films budget 0.80
means money 0.80
be in film 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(thing, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(thing, cost money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cgi, be in film)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cgi, cost money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cgi, shows much cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in film)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cgi, cost money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cgi, cost money)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cgi, be in film)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cgi, means money)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cgi, cost money)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cgi, shows much cost)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cgi, means more money)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cgi, shows much cost)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cgi, means money)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in film)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cgi, means more money)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cgi, means more money)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cgi, shows much cost)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cgi, means money)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cgi, means money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)