cgi: be in movies cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in movies cost 1.00
be in movies expensive 0.92
be in movie cost money 0.92
be expensive on movies 0.91
be in movies 0.89
be used in movies 0.88
be bad in movies 0.86
have impact on films budget 0.83
compared to movies 0.83
be in movies created 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)