cgi: have impact on films budget

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have impact on films budget 1.00
be in films 0.84
be in movies cost 0.83
be in movies 0.80
be in film 0.80
be in movie cost money 0.80
be expensive on movies 0.79
be in movies created 0.79
be in movies expensive 0.79
be used in movies 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cgi, be in film)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cgi, be in films)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in films)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in film)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cgi, be in film)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in film)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)