chewing gum: be bad in school

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in school 1.00
be good in school 0.96
be in school 0.93
be baned from school 0.92
be in class bad 0.83
be bad for health 0.79
be in class good 0.78
be banned in schools 0.77
has quality bad 0.77
be in school prohibited 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(eating, be in school)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in class good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gum, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(eating, be in school)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(eating, be in school)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(gum, be banned in schools)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gum, be in class good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, be in class good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be bad in school)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in class bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be in class bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be banned in schools)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be banned in schools)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be bad in school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating, be in school)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned in schools)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, be in class good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, has quality bad)