clojure: is dynamic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lisp
Weight: 0.44
, language
Weight: 0.44
, programming language
Weight: 0.43
, topic
Weight: 0.39
Siblings english language
Weight: 0.27
, sign language
Weight: 0.27
, italian language
Weight: 0.27
, chinese language
Weight: 0.26
, american sign language
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dynamic 1.00
be dynamic 0.99
be referred to to dynamic 0.87
be than dynamic languages 0.82
be than other dynamic languages 0.80
be than faster dynamic languages 0.80
be than faster other dynamic languages 0.79
is powerful 0.76
is unique 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(clojure, is dynamic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(clojure, is dynamic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(clojure, is dynamic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(clojure, is dynamic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(clojure, is dynamic)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(language, be dynamic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, is dynamic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lisp, is powerful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(english language, is powerful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(english language, is unique)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chinese language, is unique)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(english language, is dynamic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(clojure, is dynamic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(clojure, is dynamic)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(clojure, is dynamic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(clojure, is dynamic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(clojure, is dynamic)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(english language, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(english language, is dynamic)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(chinese language, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chinese language, is unique)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(english language, is powerful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(english language, is powerful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(english language, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(english language, is unique)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(clojure, is dynamic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(clojure, is dynamic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(language, be dynamic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(language, is dynamic)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(english language, is dynamic)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chinese language, is unique)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(english language, is powerful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(english language, is unique)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(language, be dynamic)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(language, is dynamic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(clojure, is dynamic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
...