corruption: be endemic in indonesia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be endemic in indonesia 1.00
be endemic in nigeria 0.89
be rampant in kenya 0.83
be prevalent in europe 0.80
be prevalent in uk 0.80
be rampant in philippines 0.79
be prevalent in france 0.78
be common in african countries 0.77
be problem in south africa 0.77
be in places like africa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)