defense: is public

Related concepts

Parents	position Weight: 0.62 , weakness Weight: 0.61 , defense attorney Weight: 0.59 , factor Weight: 0.58 , sector Weight: 0.58
Siblings	offense Weight: 0.33 , midfield Weight: 0.33 , aviation Weight: 0.32 , linebacker Weight: 0.32 , third base Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is public	1.00
is public good	0.94
be for public office	0.86
be better than public	0.86
be example of public good	0.84
be more effective than public sector	0.80
be for public office in executive	0.79
be for public office filled	0.79
be for public office in executive filled	0.76
be accountable to public	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(position, be for public office) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(position, be for public office in executive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(position, be for public office filled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(position, be for public office in executive filled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(sector, be accountable to public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(sector, be accountable to public)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(position, be for public office)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(position, be for public office in executive filled)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(position, be for public office filled)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(position, be for public office in executive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office in executive filled)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office in executive)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office filled)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(sector, be accountable to public)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(position, be for public office) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(defense, is public)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(defense, is public)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(defense, is public)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(position, be for public office in executive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(defense, is public)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(position, be for public office filled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(defense, is public)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(position, be for public office in executive filled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(defense, is public)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(sector, be accountable to public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(defense, is public)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(defense, is public)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(defense, is public good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(defense, is public good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(defense, be example of public good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(defense, be example of public good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(defense, is public)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(sector, be accountable to public)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(position, be for public office)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(position, be for public office in executive filled)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(position, be for public office filled)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(position, be for public office in executive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(sector, be accountable to public)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(position, be for public office)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(position, be for public office in executive filled)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(position, be for public office filled)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(defense, is public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(position, be for public office in executive)