defense: be example of public good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of public good 1.00
be example of good 0.92
is public good 0.89
is public 0.84
be better than public 0.82
be for public office 0.78
be more effective than public sector 0.77
be use examples 0.76
be related use examples 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(position, be for public office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be use examples)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(position, be for public office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(factor, be use examples)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defense, be example of public good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(position, be for public office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defense, be example of public good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defense, be example of public good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defense, be example of public good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defense, be example of public good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(defense, be example of public good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(defense, is public)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(defense, is public)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(defense, is public good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(defense, is public)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(defense, be example of good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(defense, be example of good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(defense, be example of good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be use examples)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(position, be for public office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be use examples)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(defense, be example of public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(position, be for public office)