defense: is public good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is public good 1.00
is public 0.94
be example of public good 0.89
be better than public 0.89
be for public office 0.83
be more effective than public sector 0.80
has quality good 0.78
be for public office filled 0.77
be for public office in executive 0.76
be accountable to public 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(position, be for public office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(position, be for public office filled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(position, be for public office in executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sector, be accountable to public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sector, be accountable to public)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(position, be for public office)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(position, be for public office filled)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(position, be for public office in executive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office in executive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(position, be for public office filled)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sector, be accountable to public)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(offense, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(position, be for public office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(position, be for public office filled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(position, be for public office in executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sector, be accountable to public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(offense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(offense, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(defense, is public good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(defense, is public)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(defense, is public)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(defense, be example of public good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(defense, is public)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be example of public good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(defense, be example of public good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defense, be example of public good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(defense, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sector, be accountable to public)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(position, be for public office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(position, be for public office filled)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(position, be for public office in executive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(offense, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sector, be accountable to public)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(position, be for public office)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(position, be for public office filled)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(defense, is public good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(position, be for public office in executive)