domain: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, web site
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, asset
Weight: 0.55
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.76
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.85
is quality 0.80
has quality worth 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(domain, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(domain, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(domain, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(domain, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(domain, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(domain, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)