domain: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, web site
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, asset
Weight: 0.55
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.76
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
has quality shit 0.79
is bad thing 0.79
affect water quality 0.78
has quality prices 0.77
be bad playing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(domain, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(web browser, be bad playing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(web, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(domain, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(domain, has quality wrong)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(domain, has quality wrong)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(domain, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(domain, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)