dry: is meat better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is meat better 1.00
is meat 0.95
is beef better 0.90
is aged meat better 0.87
is beef 0.84
is steak better 0.84
is aged beef better 0.82
is aged meat 0.81
is aged steak better 0.78
is steak 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(dry, is meat better)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(dry, is meat)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(dry, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dry, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dry, is meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dry, is steak)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dry, is steak)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dry, is steak)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dry, is steak better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dry, is beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dry, is steak better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(dry, is steak better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dry, is steak)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, is beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dry, is steak better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dry, is beef better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dry, is beef better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dry, is meat better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dry, is meat better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dry, is meat better)