dry: is aged meat better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is aged meat better 1.00
is aged meat 0.98
is aged beef better 0.95
is aged beef 0.93
be aged expensive beef 0.92
is aged steak better 0.91
be aged safe beef 0.91
is aged steak 0.89
is meat better 0.87
is meat 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak better)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(dry, is meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(dry, is meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dry, is meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dry, is meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(dry, is meat better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dry, is meat better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dry, is meat better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)