dry: is aged steak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is aged steak 1.00
is aged steak better 0.98
is aged meat 0.90
is steak 0.90
is aged meat better 0.89
is aged beef 0.88
is steak better 0.88
be aged expensive beef 0.87
is aged beef better 0.87
be aged safe beef 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dry, is steak)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dry, is steak)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dry, is steak)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dry, is steak)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dry, is steak better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(dry, is steak better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dry, is steak better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dry, is steak better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak)