dry: be aged expensive beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be aged expensive beef 1.00
is aged beef 0.97
is aged beef better 0.97
be aged safe beef 0.95
is aged meat 0.92
is aged meat better 0.92
is aged steak 0.87
is aged steak better 0.87
is beef 0.86
is beef better 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dry, is beef)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, is beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dry, is beef better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dry, is beef better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef)