dry: is aged beef better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is aged beef better 1.00
is aged beef 0.98
be aged expensive beef 0.97
be aged safe beef 0.95
is aged meat better 0.95
is aged meat 0.92
is aged steak better 0.89
is beef better 0.89
is aged steak 0.87
is beef 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef better)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dry, is beef)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, is beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dry, is beef better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dry, is beef better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(dry, is aged beef better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better)