dry: is aged meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is aged meat 1.00
is aged meat better 0.98
is aged beef 0.94
is aged beef better 0.92
be aged expensive beef 0.92
be aged safe beef 0.90
is aged steak 0.90
is aged steak better 0.89
is meat 0.85
is meat better 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(dry, is meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(dry, is meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dry, is meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dry, is meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dry, is meat better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(dry, is meat better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dry, is meat better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dry, is meat better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)