dry: is aged beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, wine
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, track
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.33
, hot water
Weight: 0.33
, wet
Weight: 0.32
, moisture
Weight: 0.32
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is aged beef 1.00
is aged beef better 0.98
be aged expensive beef 0.97
be aged safe beef 0.95
is aged meat 0.94
is aged meat better 0.93
is aged steak 0.88
is beef 0.88
is aged steak better 0.87
is beef better 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged meat better)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dry, be aged safe beef)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged steak better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged beef better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, be aged expensive beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged meat better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dry, is aged steak better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dry, is aged meat better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dry, is aged steak better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dry, is beef)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dry, is beef better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dry, is aged meat better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dry, is aged steak better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dry, is beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dry, is aged beef better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dry, is beef better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dry, is beef better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dry, is beef better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dry, is aged beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dry, is aged beef)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dry, is aged beef)