energy: be from wind renewable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, sector
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from wind renewable 1.00
be renewable 0.94
is renewable 0.93
is renewable resorce 0.93
be considered renewable 0.91
be consider renewable 0.89
be better than wind energy 0.88
is renewable resource 0.87
be called renewable resources 0.86
be considered renewable resource 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wind, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind energy)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be renewable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is renewable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(wind, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wind, is renewable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wind, be considered renewable)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wind, be considered renewable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind energy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than wind energy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be renewable)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be renewable)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is renewable)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, is renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(energy, be renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(energy, is renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be consider renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be consider renewable)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than wind energy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(energy, be better than wind energy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(energy, be renewable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(energy, be consider renewable)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(energy, be better than wind energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(energy, be consider renewable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(energy, be better than wind energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(energy, be from wind renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(solar energy, be called renewable resources)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(solar energy, be considered renewable resource)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wind, be considered renewable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(solar energy, is renewable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than wind energy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(solar energy, be renewable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wind, is renewable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be from wind renewable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)