fingerprint: relate to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evidence
Weight: 0.64
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.62
, signature
Weight: 0.59
, database
Weight: 0.58
Siblings handwriting
Weight: 0.34
, scanner
Weight: 0.34
, computer science
Weight: 0.33
, dna
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to science 1.00
be important in science 0.88
be used in science 0.87
be useful in science 0.85
be considered as science 0.84
be considered as positive science 0.81
be important in forensic science 0.78
be useful in forensic science 0.78
be used in forensic science 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(evidence, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(evidence, be important in forensic science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(evidence, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(evidence, be used in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(evidence, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(evidence, be important in forensic science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be used in science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be important in forensic science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be important in science)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(evidence, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(evidence, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(evidence, be important in forensic science)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fingerprint, relate to science)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be considered as positive science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be considered as positive science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be used in forensic science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be considered as positive science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be used in forensic science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered as positive science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be used in forensic science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be important in forensic science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be useful in forensic science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be useful in forensic science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be used in forensic science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be useful in forensic science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be useful in forensic science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fingerprint, be important in forensic science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be important in forensic science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be important in forensic science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evidence, be used in science)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in science)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in forensic science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evidence, be used in science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in science)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fingerprint, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in forensic science)