geography: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
be considered more of social science than science 0.94
be called science 0.93
is science 0.93
be considered social science 0.93
be part of science 0.92
be like science 0.91
be known as science 0.91
be different as science 0.89
be considered mother of science 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(geography, be considered science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(science, be called science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be called science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be called science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(geography, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, be called science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(geography, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(geography, be considered more of social science than science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered more of social science than science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be part of science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(geography, be like science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered mother of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(geography, be considered more of social science than science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(geography, be considered more of social science than science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(geography, be part of science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(geography, be considered social science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, be part of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(geography, be like science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(geography, be part of science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(geography, be considered mother of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(geography, be considered social science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(geography, be considered social science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(geography, be like science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(geography, be like science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(geography, be considered mother of science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(geography, be considered mother of science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(geography, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be called science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, be called science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(geography, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be called science)