giving: be to good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.49
, service
Weight: 0.48
, information
Weight: 0.47
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, let
Weight: 0.32
, turning
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31
, finding
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to good 1.00
feel good 0.89
be to poor good 0.88
has quality good 0.86
is bad thing 0.82
has quality bad 0.82
is bad luck 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giving, be to good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(finding, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(giving, be to good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(finding, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(finding, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(giving, be to good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(giving, be to poor good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(giving, is bad luck)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad luck)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(giving, feel good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giving, be to good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(finding, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(giving, be to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)